“We’ve inherited 18 months of pipeline that we actually have to drain right now, while we’re actually building the next wave of innovation and product lines.” — Google CFO Patrick Pichette, explaining that it will be a while before we see a great Motorola product. (via parislemon)
Or, you know, they could just cut the pipeline and focus.
Convert DVDs to UltraViolet digital copies without leaving home -
Smart idea…
…if any Apple devices were compatible with UltraViolet.
…or if anyone had any idea what UltraViolet was.
I wonder if Apple does something like this eventually as well. It’s like “Rip. Mix. Burn.” — except you pay for it. But I actually think that’s fine if you get an upgrade to HD along the way and automatically get your movies into iCloud (to access from any iDevice).
As someone who has tried to rip their entire DVD collection for several years now, I can tell you what a pain in the ass it is (hence, “several years now”).
(via claustroxfuckingxphobic-deactiv)
I’ve missed you my friend. (Taken with Instagram)
[video]
Google, Where The Best Of Everything Is Perpetually 6 Months Away -
Well, it’s been about 6 months.
“In the next six months we plan to market a tablet of the highest quality.”
That was Google Chairman Eric Schmidt speaking to reporters in Italy yesterday.
For those keeping score at home, that’s now three major things Schmidt has promised in the next 6 months.
At LeWeb a couple weeks ago, he promised that third-party developers would start writing the best apps for Android first instead of iOS in 6 months.
Later at the same conference, he said that “the majority” all televisions in stores in 6 months would run Google TV.
Now Google’s “iPad killer” is coming in 6 months.
It’s either going to be an extremely busy June for Google — or an extremely busy June for Google’s PR department when Google fulfills none of Schmidt’s promises.
“If you would not be forgotten, as soon as you are dead and rotten, either write things worth reading, or do things worth writing.” —
Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard’s Almanac. 1960 (via ingridrichter)
A great quote.
(via parislemon)
(via merlin)
By most accounts, LTE is blazing fast, especially on Verizon. The problem, as made very apparent by the new iPad, is that a 3GB cap is simply not enough for even “normal” use by customers buying cutting edge LTE devices. Even 10GB wouldn’t be enough for a very moderate user when video streaming or video chat are becoming commonplace.
I think the carriers basically suck. At least there is competition, but it’s almost a collusion of crap. Neither Verizon nor AT&T seem willing to push the envelope to lure customers to their side. The iPad or iPhone doesn’t care. They work anywhere. Sprint is trying to push truly unlimited to draw in iPhone customers. That’s smart.
I think something that could actually work, make LTE relevant, and make the carriers a lot more revenue and profit, is something they seem to have no interest in. It’s quite simply to provide home broadband service. Clear and similar companies are trying to do this, but their services are pretty bad and throttle in as little as 10GB. And it’s not their own network, they just piggyback.
Let’s take Verizon, though. They could offer a family plan that combines the data of all devices in a household. This could include a “home” broadband device, an LTE modem. While at “home” Verizon could offer more reasonable caps, a minimum of 150GB to make them a true broadband provider competitive with cable providers or DSL (I’d prefer at least 250GB).
It’s simple enough for Verizon to track where a user is. So long as that user is using data from “home” then the larger cap is used. If they “roam” outside of their home area then a smaller cap, perhaps 10GB or so minimum, would be in place.
Verizon could properly plan their infrastructure if they knew where users would be. If they knew X users would be at home on a given tower they could plan that capacity appropriately, with a side effect being they would likely have more towers in the long run as they could draw in more customers.
Offering something beyond simply LTE on a mobile device could bring in more customers, therefore more revenues. Those revenues are more predictable, especially geographically speaking.
I think this is a win-win and I’m not sure why no carrier has tried it, unless there is perhaps some FCC issue I’m not aware of if they were to also become a “home” ISP.
I would drop Comcast in a heartbeat and move all my iPhones/iPads to the first carrier that offered something like this. It has a network (pun intended) effect that also provides lock-in. It’s a benefit to me, as a consumer, since I can break free from cable and combine all my Internet data into a single bucket. Since I’m using 90%+ of my data at home, the smaller roaming cap is acceptable.
Imagine if AT&T also combined this with their huge wifi hotspot network, giving them even more advantage.
(Source: 6tfoot)
[video]